Difference between revisions of "Phase2 Iteration6"
From RFF Wiki
(→C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
===== C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata ===== | ===== C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata ===== | ||
| − | The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will | + | The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will continue this task by |
* collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far | * collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far | ||
* sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data | * sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* defining the maintenance process | * defining the maintenance process | ||
| − | We know that this task will accompany us for several iterations. | + | We know that this task will accompany us for several iterations. |
===== DISCO: Discovery Session planning ===== | ===== DISCO: Discovery Session planning ===== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:57, 3 May 2021
The Phase 2 works in iterations. See setup of the Architecture stream.
Contents
Iteration 6
The six iteration lasts from 6.May to 27.May.
Topics
Capabilities
C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata
The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will continue this task by
- collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far
- sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data
- evaluate whether a data quality assurance is needed (CRD KPI)
- defining the maintenance process
We know that this task will accompany us for several iterations.
DISCO: Discovery Session planning
We will use this iteration
- to plan and prepare the Gap Discovery session and
- to support and follow up with the contact persons of the RFF partners.
SM: SmartService Profile
Based on the Smart Services list we continue to describe the Smart Services. With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization.
Reviews
Reporting Tool
Smart Service profiles
- SM_08 Siding Everywhere
- SM_17 Facilities on location
- SM_24 Authority Communication
