Difference between revisions of "Phase2 Iteration5"

From RFF Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "The Phase 2 works in iterations. See setup of the Architecture stream. == Iteration 5 == The fifth iteration lasts from 25.March to 15.April. === Topics === ==== Capabilitie...")
 
(Iteration 5)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
There are two new topics to handle:
 
There are two new topics to handle:
 
===== C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests =====
 
===== C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests =====
 +
The task foresees to lower the hurdles for A type RUs to access RollingStock datasets.
 +
This should be achieved by utilizing Office technology.
  
 
===== C14: Define report tool for RFF =====
 
===== C14: Define report tool for RFF =====
Line 28: Line 30:
 
With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization.
 
With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization.
  
==== C43: WPM KPI Web Monitor ====
+
----
 +
 
 +
=== Reviews ===
 +
==== Smart Service profiles ====
 +
* SM_08 [[Siding Everywhere]]
 +
* SM_17 [[Facilities on location]]
 +
* SM_24 [[Authority Communication]]
 +
 
 +
----
 +
=== Results ===

Revision as of 16:04, 13 April 2021

The Phase 2 works in iterations. See setup of the Architecture stream.

Iteration 5

The fifth iteration lasts from 25.March to 15.April.

Topics

Capabilities

There are two new topics to handle:

C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests

The task foresees to lower the hurdles for A type RUs to access RollingStock datasets. This should be achieved by utilizing Office technology.

C14: Define report tool for RFF

And three existing to continue:

C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata

The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will start this task in this iteration by

  • collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far
  • sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data
  • evaluate whether a data quality assurance is needed (CRD KPI)
  • defining the maintenance process

We know that this task will accompany us for several iterations.

SM: SmartService Profile

Based on the Smart Services list we continue to describe the Smart Services. With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization.


Reviews

Smart Service profiles


Results