Difference between revisions of "Phase2 Iteration5"
From RFF Wiki
(Created page with "The Phase 2 works in iterations. See setup of the Architecture stream. == Iteration 5 == The fifth iteration lasts from 25.March to 15.April. === Topics === ==== Capabilitie...") |
(→Iteration 5) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
There are two new topics to handle: | There are two new topics to handle: | ||
===== C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests ===== | ===== C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests ===== | ||
+ | The task foresees to lower the hurdles for A type RUs to access RollingStock datasets. | ||
+ | This should be achieved by utilizing Office technology. | ||
===== C14: Define report tool for RFF ===== | ===== C14: Define report tool for RFF ===== | ||
Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization. | With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization. | ||
− | ==== | + | ---- |
+ | |||
+ | === Reviews === | ||
+ | ==== Smart Service profiles ==== | ||
+ | * SM_08 [[Siding Everywhere]] | ||
+ | * SM_17 [[Facilities on location]] | ||
+ | * SM_24 [[Authority Communication]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | === Results === |
Revision as of 15:04, 13 April 2021
The Phase 2 works in iterations. See setup of the Architecture stream.
Contents
Iteration 5
The fifth iteration lasts from 25.March to 15.April.
Topics
Capabilities
There are two new topics to handle:
C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests
The task foresees to lower the hurdles for A type RUs to access RollingStock datasets. This should be achieved by utilizing Office technology.
C14: Define report tool for RFF
And three existing to continue:
C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata
The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will start this task in this iteration by
- collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far
- sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data
- evaluate whether a data quality assurance is needed (CRD KPI)
- defining the maintenance process
We know that this task will accompany us for several iterations.
SM: SmartService Profile
Based on the Smart Services list we continue to describe the Smart Services. With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization.
Reviews
Smart Service profiles
- SM_08 Siding Everywhere
- SM_17 Facilities on location
- SM_24 Authority Communication