Difference between revisions of "Maintenance Requirements"

From RFF Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Evaluation)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
== Use Case ==
 
== Use Case ==
#Predictive Maintenance (planned maintenance either bring it back to your home base or search for the service in the partner network)
+
#Predictive Maintenance
#Cross-border Operations & Maintenance (on demand when it happens).
+
The Ressource owner plans the services and maintenance work, either by bringing the loco/the wagon back to his home base or search for the service in the partner network. With a comparable information about the work shop services the planner can better decide where and when to have the service been conducted.
 +
#Cross-border Operations & Maintenance  
 +
In case a ressource needs an unplanned service or maintenance work the operator can find the best work shop in relation to location and offered services. This happens on demand when the need arises in operation.
  
  
Line 17: Line 19:
  
 
== Evaluation ==
 
== Evaluation ==
 +
 +
* Frank Kschonsak on 25.June 2021
 +
Components should be defined to have “candidates” for predictive maintenance, like “Batteries” or “Pantograph”. Having this, the procedures how to collect (sensorics) and evaluate (KI, data warehouse) should be described.
 +
“Maintenance packages” probably depending on the error code-classifications (mandatory,…).
 +
A landscape of workshops in Europe would be appreciated, showing the scope of manufacturers and vehicle-types (“specialization”).

Latest revision as of 10:26, 6 July 2021

Description

This smart service provides a common European maintenance standard for assets (locos and wagons). It defines asset maintenance requirements e.g. common maintenance packages as light, medium, heavy. Workshop qualifications should be defined to reach certifications to perform equal maintenance. The smart service shall include facilities descriptions and availble equipment and tools. Digital Traceability on what has been done and Certification will be digital made available.

Use Case

  1. Predictive Maintenance

The Ressource owner plans the services and maintenance work, either by bringing the loco/the wagon back to his home base or search for the service in the partner network. With a comparable information about the work shop services the planner can better decide where and when to have the service been conducted.

  1. Cross-border Operations & Maintenance

In case a ressource needs an unplanned service or maintenance work the operator can find the best work shop in relation to location and offered services. This happens on demand when the need arises in operation.


Preconditions

Basic Services

Dependencies

Planned Steps

Evaluation

  • Frank Kschonsak on 25.June 2021

Components should be defined to have “candidates” for predictive maintenance, like “Batteries” or “Pantograph”. Having this, the procedures how to collect (sensorics) and evaluate (KI, data warehouse) should be described. “Maintenance packages” probably depending on the error code-classifications (mandatory,…). A landscape of workshops in Europe would be appreciated, showing the scope of manufacturers and vehicle-types (“specialization”).