Difference between revisions of "Phase2 Iteration5"
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
=== Results === | === Results === | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests ===== | ||
| + | The task foresees to lower the hurdles for A type RUs to access RollingStock datasets. | ||
| + | This should be achieved by utilizing Office technology. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== C14: Define report tool for RFF ===== | ||
| + | We settled the basis to define the centrally operated reporting tool for the RFF digital platform. | ||
| + | [[Reporting Tool]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will start this task in this iteration by | ||
| + | * collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far | ||
| + | * sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data | ||
| + | * evaluate whether a data quality assurance is needed (CRD KPI) | ||
| + | * defining the maintenance process | ||
| + | |||
| + | The findings can be found at [[Master Data]]. | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 30 April 2021
The Phase 2 works in iterations. See setup of the Architecture stream.
Contents
Iteration 5
The fifth iteration lasts from 15.April to 6.May.
Topics
Capabilities
There are two new topics to handle:
C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests
The task foresees to lower the hurdles for A type RUs to access RollingStock datasets. This should be achieved by utilizing Office technology.
C14: Define report tool for RFF
The target is to define the centrally operated reporting tool for the RFF digital platform.
And two existing to continue:
C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata
The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will start this task in this iteration by
- collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far
- sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data
- evaluate whether a data quality assurance is needed (CRD KPI)
- defining the maintenance process
We know that this task will accompany us for several iterations.
SM: SmartService Profile
Based on the Smart Services list we continue to describe the Smart Services. With these profiles we can then start the discussion with the CIO/steering committee on prioritization.
Reviews
Smart Service profiles
- SM_08 Siding Everywhere
- SM_17 Facilities on location
- SM_24 Authority Communication
Results
C43: Office Integration of RSDS requests
The task foresees to lower the hurdles for A type RUs to access RollingStock datasets. This should be achieved by utilizing Office technology.
C14: Define report tool for RFF
We settled the basis to define the centrally operated reporting tool for the RFF digital platform. Reporting Tool
C01: Managed CRD Location Masterdata
The target of this task is to enhance the CRD masterdata to a level where it can be used as new GEO masterdata reference. We will start this task in this iteration by
- collect the experience and gaps with the CRD data quality so far
- sketch a analysis method to determine the actual state of the master data
- evaluate whether a data quality assurance is needed (CRD KPI)
- defining the maintenance process
The findings can be found at Master Data.
